[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Genocide Convention ] [ Impartial Tribunal? - Part 2. ] [ Impartial Tribunal 3 ] [ Impartial Tribunal 4 ] [ Impartial Justice 5 ]

 

US troops out of Europe!
Genocide Convention
Impartial Tribunal? - Part 2.
Impartial Tribunal 3
Impartial Tribunal 4
Impartial Justice 5


Archives

Highly recommended articles:
+ This is the News
+ Bar Too High For Serbs to Comply
+ Why New World Order Hates Serbs
+ New Roman Empire
+A Truly Heroic Resistance
+Theory of American Stupidity
+Last Free People in Europe

of the Belgrade Coup

Editor & Webmaster
Leon Chame - 2008

An Impartial Tribunal? - Part 5.

Not a judicial body worthy of international respect

No citizen of any country in the world would consider themselves fairly tried before a court that was paid for, staffed and assisted by private citizens or corporations which had a direct stake in the outcome of the trial and who were, themselves, in practical terms, immune from that court. It is a well established principle of law that a party in a legal action, whether civil or criminal, is entitled to ask for the removal of any judge sitting on the case when there exists a reasonable apprehension of bias.

In this instance, a compelling argument can be made that the bias is not only apprehended, it is real, that it is not of one judge but of the entire tribunal, that this is not a judicial body worthy of international respect but a kangaroo court, a bogus court, with a political purpose serving very powerful and identifiable masters.

A crime against peace under the Nuremberg Principles?

To be consistent with my thesis, I will go further and say that as a political instrument designed to violate, to destroy, the integrity and sovereignty of a country, its creation is a crime against peace under the Nuremberg Principles. Instead of resolving conflict as it claims, it is used to justify conflict, instead of creating peace, it is used to justify war and therefore is an instrument of war.

Will Slobodan Milosevic receive a fair trial if they take him? Will the leaders of NATO, even be investigated let alone indicted for war crimes committed in the brutal attack on the civilian population of Yugoslavia, as my colleagues in Canada, South and Central America, Spain, Norway, Greece, Britain, and the United States have requested?

As the English say, the proof is in the pudding. Our requests have met with empty words and no action. We made the requests in order to bring to the attention of the world the crimes that were being committed by Nato. We believe we have succeeded in that.

If we have not succeeded in bringing to justice the war criminals of Nato, it is because we have exposed the political nature of this Tribunal instead.